Home
entries friends calendar user info John Bambenek's New Blog Previous Previous Next Next

Advertisement

Ravings of John C. A. Bambenek - November 23rd, 2004
"Kicking butt for the common good" - Glenn Reynolds
Good news out of the federal budget coming out. It's now law that the government can't pressure doctors or hospitals to provide abortions if they don't want. It's nice to be able to choose.

=============

CULTURE & COSMOS

November 23, 2004 Volume 2, Number 16

New Federal Budget Contains Key Victories for Pro-Life Cause

After weeks of negotiations and wrangling Congress gave final
approval over the weekend to a new comprehensive spending bill
containing
several key victories for the pro-life and pro-family cause. Republican
leaders succeeded in including provisions preventing state governments
from forcing health providers to perform abortions, substantially
bolstered funding for abstinence education and increased funding to
fight
sex trafficking.

Chief among the pro-life victories was the enactment of the
Weldon-Hyde Conscience Protection amendment which prohibits federal,
state
or local agencies from forcing health care providers to provide
abortion
services in order to receive funds. The legislation ensures that health
care providers opposed to abortions will not be forced to choose
between
violating their conscience or losing government aid.

The pro-life language, sponsored by Florida Republican Rep. Dave
Weldon, was backed by GOP members of the House who have been in
negotiations with the Senate over the spending bill. Republican Sen.
Arlen
Specter, a key Senate negotiator, was expected to offer resistance to
the
Conscience Protection amendment. But after almost losing the
chairmanship
of the Senate Judiciary Committee for making remarks that he favored
pro-abortion judges for the Supreme Court, a newly chastened Specter
allowed the provision.

Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Gloria Feldt
was
unhappy with the news that health care providers would be given greater
freedom to follow their conscience. "It allows any health care provider
or
institution, religious or otherwise, to refuse to provide a much-needed
reproductive health care service." A press release from NARAL
Pro-Choice
America called the provision a "major new restriction on women's
freedom."
Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., called the charge nonsense. "If they consider
giving a hospital the freedom to not perform an abortion to be 'a major
new restriction' then it is clear there is no limit to their promotion
of
abortion, including using the force of law to require pro-life
hospitals
to kill unborn children."

There were other pro-life victories in the spending bill. Funding
for
abstinence education went from $75 million to a little more than $104
million, an increase of 39 percent and more than $29 million from last
year's budget. Though the new amount falls short of President George
Bush's request of $181.9 million, it still makes headway into achieving
parity for abstinence funding versus funding for "safe-sex" programs. A
recent study by the Heritage Foundation revealed that the government
spends $12 on safe-sex education and contraception promotion for every
one
dollar spent on abstinence education.

Bush and pro-life forces scored another triumph by securing $25
million to fight sex trafficking that had been withheld last year by
Congressional appropriators. Half of the $25 million came from money
originally intended for the "family planning account" of the US Agency
for
International Development (USAID).

The bill is expected to be signed by Bush by December 3.

Copyright, 2004 --- Culture of Life Foundation. Permission granted for
unlimited use. Credit required.

Culture of Life Foundation
1413 K Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington DC 20005
Phone: (202) 289-2500
Fax: (202) 289-2502
E-mail: clf@culture-of-life.org
Website: http://www.culture-of-life.org
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=1&u=/nm/20041123/ts_nm/media_rather_dc

The one thing is that he's staying on at 60 minutes and "other assignments". If you'll remember it's the stunt on 60 minutes that got him in trouble in the first place. One wonders why he didn't resign there or resign completely. It doesn't seem like CBS is all that interesting in cleaning house after all.
Just had one of my users come up and bring back some CDs. He needed some software installed on his laptop and I wasn't the quickest about it, mostly because things like exploding air conditioners in my datacenter slowed me down. He brought up an Iced Tea for me from the vending machine. It's kinda nice to be appreciated...

Current Mood: busy
Current Music: DI.fm Vocal Trance

I think this is quite telling. A popular political pundit gets dumped from the op-ed page of a paper (more here) because she pillories liberals. She's been a rising star lately actually. Some leftie complains and they dump her, and you can see in raw form what they really think here. It's always enlightening to skim the DU forums to see what the rank and file really think without being filtered by the MSM.

Link thanks:
Blogs of War - In Defense of Michelle Malkin II
Michelle Malkin's website
David Limbaugh's take

Current Mood: busy
Current Music: DI.fm Vocal Trance

profile
John C. A. Bambenek
User: [info]bambenek
Name: John C. A. Bambenek
calendar
Back February 2008
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272829
Links
about this journal
I have moved my blog to Part-Time Pundit, you can find my columns and commentary there.

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from:
Powered by FeedBurner

page summary
tags